News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google/Fitbit will monetise health data and harm consumers by read_if_gay_ on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @12:49PM (#24640771)
In a philosophical sense yes, but there’s degrees to both of them, and once you consider practical issues your options will often be a mix of good and evil.
Re:Google/Fitbit will monetise health data and harm consumers by alienfilesystem on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @01:00PM (#24640918)
Thank you for your comment, but please clarify how a moral person can see "degrees" of evil and allow themselves to make money with a conscience, knowing full well they are not being lawful good (Sorry, my D&D youth)?

As for myself, I work for non-profits largely because I want to do good for others. I cannot see taking advantage of another's data, for instance, without their consent (real or imagined) to make a profit and then share it with them. Perhaps I'm a goody-two-shoes, but I'll accept it. I cannot fathom working a job where my existence is to bleed out as much profit from others without them knowing, or if they do know, them not having a voice or a way out short of not using the devices of modernity.

Re:Google/Fitbit will monetise health data and harm consumers by nxc18 on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @01:48PM (#24641449)
Do you work for a non-profit in the United States, Canada, the UK, France, or another western country and pay taxes?

Do your taxes contribute to murdering foreigners in a desert far away?

Are you evil?

This isn't a personal attack, I just really struggle when I see moral absolutism and binary thinking. The world isn't binary even though our work with computers and human systems often lead us to pretend that it is.

Re:Google/Fitbit will monetise health data and harm consumers by throwaway_pdp09 on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @01:17PM (#24641106)
Do you eat meat? I don't, for moral reasons. If you do does that make you evil in my eyes? Are you in fact evil?

I could do this all day. A clear and unambigious view of what's wrong and right is a risky thing - you will be compelled to fix it, without limits to your interference.

That was provocative and I think you're a good person but I don't think it's so easy, or safe, to draw a dividing line. But that risks not drawing a dividing line, so more dangers lurk.

Re:Google/Fitbit will monetise health data and harm consumers by alienfilesystem on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @02:29PM (#24641962)
Thank you for your comments. I agree with you that this can be taken to the nth degree and it benefits no one. I guess I could say that I do my best to avoid "grey" areas if at all possible. If I don't stand for something, I fall for anything.

As far as meat goes, I don't eat red meat. Fish, yes. Chicken, don't really care for it. I could easily get by on fish, rice, beans, salads, etc. I see your point. My eating fish would be evil to someone else since a life is lost in doing so. Beef is nasty to me because I hate even seeing fat on food. As an aside, to me, nothing is better than fried fish or a salad made from chilled chickpeas, lime juice, cilantro, diced Roma tomatoes, and red onion. Add Serrano or Jalapeno peppers if you like spicy.

Re:Google/Fitbit will monetise health data and harm consumers by dbliss on Wednesday September 30, 2020 @01:17PM (#24641114)
So there's no nuance to anything people do, there are only good or evil people? That's quite an extreme view.