Re:“Time-restricted eating did not confer weight loss”
by soneca on Tuesday September 29, 2020 @03:40PM
(#24632028)
The tricky thing is that in the internet lot of different people might be claiming and understanding different things for that is “16:8”.
This research is good as evidence that 16:8 is not sufficient for weight loss if you are eating ”ad libitum” during the 8 hours. It might be considered ”common sense”, or ”obvious”, or ”not what proponents of 16:8 claim”. But it is an important clarification nonetheless.
This research is good as evidence that 16:8 is not sufficient for weight loss if you are eating ”ad libitum” during the 8 hours. It might be considered ”common sense”, or ”obvious”, or ”not what proponents of 16:8 claim”. But it is an important clarification nonetheless.