Nuclear plants take energy sequestered in matter and unleashes it to a form that ultimately will decay to heat just the same. This outcome is the same regardless of the power source.
If climate change is a relevant concern to the discussion then alongside discussing of sustainable energy there's an equal topic of how we re-sequester or eject the additional energy we've so far pumped into the atmosphere in the form of energy decaying to heat. Not to mention how to curb our energy demands so that we don't continue to worsen the situation.
>Wind farms slow down wind (obviously..)
Yeah quite a lot on the scale of large farms, slowing wind speeds by up to 50%. The optimist in me thinks this could be a beneficial thing given our atmosphere is generally expected to become more chaotic with stronger winds as a result of climate change, but the realist in me thinks it's largely irrelevant since turbines can't operate during the extremes, which are expected to become more commonplace.
>Are there any studies in this area?
Not sure, but it's an interesting question.
https://sg.catbox.moe/qzkord.png
https://images.app.goo.gl/b7gju1qDFncVwPoMA
A nuclear power plant is fairly self-contained.
A giant black solar installation captures a lot of heat that would’ve been reflected back into space.
Wind farms slow down wind (obviously..)
We all know how important the gyres in the oceans to preserving the current ecosystem.
Everything is in a delicate balance, if we start messing up something new who knows what would happen.
Are there any studies in this area?