Re:[email protected]
by ludamad on Sunday September 27, 2020 @10:11AM
(#24606739)
I don't think fresh launches, even with bold new parameters, are always considered 'huge changes' in that sense. The fact that it could break local environment's was probably not even documented in those specific environments
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:[email protected]
by nitrogen on Sunday September 27, 2020 @12:47PM
(#24607980)
There was a time when the creation of a new TLD was unthinkable, so it seemed safe to use a domain syntax internally that was never going to become a public TLD. Then the TLD money grab happened and what was assumed to be safely isolated wilderness was sold out from under everyone.
Re:[email protected]
by CydeWeys on Sunday September 27, 2020 @01:24PM
(#24608301)
There never was such a time, and IANA never said "We won't make any more". TLDs have been continually created for at least the past two decades. Look up the history of e.g. .biz, .info, .museum, .aero, .mobi, .cat, .asia, all the various ccTLDs that are created as new countries form (.ss), etc. And none of that is even counting the new gTLD expansion round that kicked off in 2012.