News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for Covid-19 adv... by tyingq on Saturday September 26, 2020 @01:18PM (#24600446)
How do they net out the idea that people with healthy lifestyles would be less likely to have a vitamin D deficiency? (Better diet, more exposure to sunlight)
Re:Vitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for Covid-19 adv... by cameldrv on Saturday September 26, 2020 @02:50PM (#24601195)
There was an actual randomized trial that came out recently [1] where hospitalized patients were given extremely large doses of Vitamin D (explanation of equvalent doses [2]) and it dramatically reduced ICU admission.

This supports the idea that Vitamin D helping with COVID is probably causal rather than just a correlation.

[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096007602...

[2] https://chrismasterjohnphd.com/covid-19/finally-confirmed-vi...

Re:Vitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for Covid-19 adv... by yokaze on Saturday September 26, 2020 @02:54PM (#24601235)
One should not leave out the important part "pilot study". As said by the authors in the conclusions themselves, it still requires a larger one to give definite answer.
Re:Vitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for Covid-19 adv... by cameldrv on Saturday September 26, 2020 @03:38PM (#24601549)
I agree that a larger N would be preferable, but the effect size was enormous, and so the P value was <.001. Therefore, IMO, it's very likely that Vitamin D has a causal effect. Given that Vitamin D has at least some causal effect, it's much more likely that the observational studies that show a correlation are due to causation.
Re:Vitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for Covid-19 adv... by DarknessFalls on Sunday September 27, 2020 @04:39AM (#24605161)
I would be interested to know if supplementation with Vitamin D + Vitamin K2 is more effective in improving survivability.
Re:Vitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for Covid-19 adv... by aplummer on Saturday September 26, 2020 @01:35PM (#24600591)
They measure obesity and find it 0.02 vs 0.01 for vitamin d, which seems a decent enough proxy for lifestyle for this kind of study so your underlying point is valid here. Actually i think the biggest missing control is race.

I went in skeptical even though intuitively being deficient in vitamin d makes sense, this isn’t convincing but I agree with with their conclusion that it’s worth a bigger study.

If someone reading is wondering whether to maintain a healthy level of vitamin D to help if you get covid, yes you should. Should have done that before this study ofc.

Re:Vitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for Covid-19 adv... by thyrsus on Sunday September 27, 2020 @02:13AM (#24604604)
Race can be a proxy for the amount of melatonin, which influences vitamin D. It can also be related to many other things. How would you use race to interpret the data?
Re:Vitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for Covid-19 adv... by aplummer on Monday September 28, 2020 @08:08PM (#24622685)
control for it if you are making claims about vitamin d
Re:Vitamin D at least 30 ng/mL reduced risk for Covid-19 adv... by techsin101 on Sunday September 27, 2020 @11:16PM (#24612629)
how much IU is this?