> This is not because "party B" wants to raise taxes on the middle class. It's because Senate budget reconciliation rules require a revote after 8 years for certain revenue changes. It's a parliamentarian technicality. There's almost no doubt that, if they were in power in 2025, they will vote to continue those cuts. If it was up to them, they would reduce taxes to 0 across the board.

Yep, they didn't even get it down to 0 and already increased our debt by 2 trillion (more than Obama). Is their plan just start printing money when needed, because some countries already tried that.

> None of this is relevant to the discussion at hand: almost everyone got a Federal tax cut in 2017 (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/business/economy/income-t...), which means that there's room for tax increases at the State level.

This is exactly what Democrats were complaining about look at the income and how many god tax cut, realize that ones who didn't got it either they got the same amount of tax or (more likely) paid more.

Compare that to a median income, also be aware that the individual tax cuts for middle class gradually expire every year.