Ask HN: Why not fix JavaScript?

Re:Ask HN: Why not fix JavaScript? by pschlump on Monday April 18, 2011 @02:45AM (#2458228)

There is no problem to fix - JavaScript is the 2nd best language. LISP is better. KnR C is 3rd. No good language is easy to learn and understand.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Why not fix JavaScript? by phamilton on Monday April 18, 2011 @02:56AM (#2458253)

Unless a language's sole purpose to be easy to learn and understand. Then by definition it's a great language.

Use the right tools for the right job. A jewelers file is pretty worthless if you are building a house. Likewise a hammer isn't very useful in the finishing touches of a diamond ring.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ask HN: Why not fix JavaScript? by gary4gar on Monday April 18, 2011 @07:02AM (#2458633)

I would argue that Python & Ruby are pretty good general purpose programming languages & yet are easier to learn.

Hence, I don't buy your hypothesis that language has to be "hard" to learn; in-order to be useful.

[ Parent | on HN ]