Re:Leak reveals $2T of possibly corrupt US financial activity
by lixtra on Thursday September 24, 2020 @03:22PM
(#24582484)
> from a position that is fundamentally wrong
I’m baffled how asking for data is revealing my position?
I had the hope that your position is well founded and it would be easy to point to actual data.
I hardly believe that the compliance laws are not accompanied by studies that collect the data that i asked for. So it should be out there.
Re:Leak reveals $2T of possibly corrupt US financial activity
by vmception on Thursday September 24, 2020 @04:55PM
(#24583528)
Like I said, I dont find your cognitive dissonance relevant enough to want to do that research for you. If you do research it, I hope the filter bubble Google put you in lets you get access to this version of reality.
Good luck.
You’re asking for something to be proved - or supporting evidence that requires a whole dissertation - because your exposure is starting from a position that is fundamentally wrong.
“Suspicious” is a misnomer referring to an automatic reporting threshold, that in fewer additional circumstances allows for discretion in filing. The end.