News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Epic, Spotify, and Tinder form advocacy group to push for... by acruns on Thursday September 24, 2020 @11:43AM (#24579691)
Wouldn't that be the record companies though? I have heard Kanye is trying to get more money for artists but not really sure. I am puzzled why blockchain+streaming for music hasn't taken off. Artists would maintain rights and profits from what I can tell
Re:Epic, Spotify, and Tinder form advocacy group to push for... by ticmasta on Thursday September 24, 2020 @11:51AM (#24579815)
Traditionally payment & accounting has never been a problem in the music business, so I think blockchain would not really help. The underlying economics is what has changed dramatically. Distribution is close to free, but unlike the ~ $1 an artist might have seen out of a CD sale (before discounting for costs & advances) they now see sub-cents on a single track. You used to pay $15-20 for an entire album to get 2 or 3 good songs; now you only stream everybody's top tracks and pay less than that a month. So the artist gets a couple of pennies for the period when they are hot, then nothing.
Re:Epic, Spotify, and Tinder form advocacy group to push for... by rblatz on Thursday September 24, 2020 @11:52AM (#24579823)
Why would you put blockchain in this?
Re:Epic, Spotify, and Tinder form advocacy group to push for... by damnyou on Thursday September 24, 2020 @12:01PM (#24579952)
For micropayments per stream, presumably.
Re:Epic, Spotify, and Tinder form advocacy group to push for... by rmah on Thursday September 24, 2020 @03:32PM (#24582576)
Blockchain is not suitable for micropayments. The computing resource requirements are many orders of magnitude too high.
Re:Epic, Spotify, and Tinder form advocacy group to push for... by damnyou on Thursday September 24, 2020 @04:40PM (#24583340)
A proof of work blockchain isn't suitable, but proof of work is one of many ways to reach distributed consensus.