So if your grandma rents out her second house to someone, they should be allowed to live there rent-free past the eviction deadline?

I disagree. When a company goes under for a bad investment, they need to not be bailed out. But when the government comes in and says it’s illegal to work your job period, the government needs to pay all the lost income from that forced closure. That’s all I’m saying.

This loss is from (insane) government intervention, not a natural risk.