We should make stickers that say that, and paste them on the cameras and drones we use to videotape the police.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sousveillance
Apparently there's also a term "metaveillance", the "veillance of veillance".
Surveillance (oversight), Sousveillance (undersight), and Metaveillance (seeing sight itself) - http://wearcam.org/kineveillance.pdf
This paper is worth a look just for the cool images of the "Sequential Wave Imprinting Machine" that visualizes waves as a means of "sensing sensors".
It's clearer on what the problem is.
[0] https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcri...
[1] https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights-transc...
> The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Although the constitution was recently changed (same one) here aswell, so you may very well have a point: https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10436005
It took what, two months to rush the new clause through? It's like being the constitution has no weight on it at all.
Inverted totalitarian klepto-plutocracy wins against any individual who doesn't take extra-ordinary measures when it builds a panopticon. "Let's see your 30 year search history and find a crime in there to persecute, I mean, prosecute you with. Or even a professional technical illegality would suffice. Searching all records." It won't be used so much to target the "baddies," but for unaccountable, omnipotent, NSA-style mass-surveillance.