I'm surprised that my comment could be interpreted in such a way! lol

(but the other comment by jonathanstrange hints that you are not alone, so maybe my writing style could use some improvement)

To the contrary, even so I'm sure that Murray is on Assage's side, he still manages to write a factual report.

To his honor, it is quite easy to make the distinction between the facts reported and Murray's opinion.

And it's based on the facts only (as included in the reports written by Murray) that I'm myself horrified by how the trial is unfair and full of procedural mistakes against Assange.

You're right, I did misread, apologies.

I think you've misinterpreted the parent comment. They are complaining about the people conducting the case.

"Suddenly, Baraitser repeated out loud the part quote that if prison conditions in the US were good and the sentence were short, then Kopelman’s clinical opinion would change, and ostentatiously typed it onto her laptop, as though it were very significant indeed."

This is not the work of a dispassionate observer.

He does not claim to be dispassionate, only to relay the facts.

As above, please name a 'fairer' source.

You probably cannot, because this is not an impartial, and certainly not 'public', process.