News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Boeing whistle-blower says proposed 737 Max fixes aren't ... by blackflame7000 on Tuesday September 22, 2020 @06:22AM (#24552850)
There have been thousands of passenger jet crashes and on the broad scheme of things this plane is still extremely safe. The fact that it wasn't a redesign means it builds off all the lessons learned over the 30+ years the 737 has been in service.

"Got to hit those quarterly sales figures." An aircraft that crashes is pretty detrimental to achieving this goal. Achieving sales figures doesn't preclude safety

Re:Boeing whistle-blower says proposed 737 Max fixes aren't ... by twh270 on Tuesday September 22, 2020 @10:20AM (#24554619)
Chasing short-term profits at the expense of long-term losses is a popular pastime of management/C-suite executives who are motivated more by "what's good for me" than by "what's good for my company/employees/customers". It creates a culture where everyone is acting more out of self-interest than they ought to.

Eventually, the company pays for it, but it can take a while.

The culture at Boeing has changed, and it seems to me that the quarterly numbers are more important now than previously.

Re:Boeing whistle-blower says proposed 737 Max fixes aren't ... by Klinky on Tuesday September 22, 2020 @02:01PM (#24557790)
>The fact that it wasn't a redesign means it builds off all the lessons learned over the 30+ years the 737 has been in service.

No, obviously it didn't, since the redesign changed the fundamental flight dynamics of the plane. It was not improving the design, it was piggybacking off the good record and past training of the old design to push out a fundamentally different product as quickly and cheaply as possible.

>Achieving sales figures doesn't preclude safety.

Then how did these fatal 737 MAXs ever get released in the first place?