News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by lawnchair_larry on Saturday September 19, 2020 @01:18AM (#24525332)
Republicans and moderates are not denying anyone’s humanity, nor do they support political policies that have no other effect than to hurt people. Nobody does. Arriving at that conclusion should tell you loud and clear that your model is incomplete and you don’t understand your opponent.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by sagichmal on Saturday September 19, 2020 @01:57AM (#24525487)
Republicans in 2020 are absolutely and inarguably doing those things.

Every vote for that party in our zeitgeist is motivated in no small part by active malignancy. It's the defining characteristic of their leader, unavoidable and undeniable, and as of the convention the party literally has no platform except to serve and support his whims. So there is absolutely a right and a wrong side to things right now.

Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by jkhdigital on Saturday September 19, 2020 @02:32AM (#24525615)
Absolutely and inarguably? A vote for a Republican is a vote for "active malignancy"? How could anyone even approach a conversation with you about this? Isn't this the exact opposite of RBG and Scalia's friendship, which is the actual topic of this comment thread?
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by sagichmal on Saturday September 19, 2020 @08:34AM (#24526993)
That's the whole point: I'm not interested in a "conversation" on the topic because there isn't one to be had.

Friendship is an even stronger signal of tacit endorsement and there are situations, positions where it's inappropriate, even morally unjustifiable, to deploy. Scalia would certainly qualify for me.

Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by nindalf on Saturday September 19, 2020 @01:47AM (#24525445)
Are you talking about the party that spent decades motivating turnout by making their base hate gay people? They denied the humanity of gay people, fought to deny them basic human rights and all for what? Just to cynically win elections?

If you didn’t know this or chose to ignore it, your model is incomplete and you don’t understand one side.

Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by lawnchair_larry on Saturday September 19, 2020 @11:28AM (#24528053)
Remind me who voted for DOMA? You need to study a little history.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by sagichmal on Saturday September 19, 2020 @12:29PM (#24528577)
You're not acting in good faith here, and it's both obvious and hilarious. You respond to someone summarizing decades of malignant propagandizing with, literally, a Whataboutism dredging up a single minor procedural issue, out of context, from like 23 years ago, and pretend that single disingenuous statement disarms the thing it's responding to. This is -- you are -- exactly what I'm talking about.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by dTal on Saturday September 19, 2020 @09:12AM (#24527192)
"Democrats aren't people anymore as far as I'm concerned"

"It's time to stop arresting these filth only to have them released the next day and start just putting them down"

--seen literally yesterday in a popular politics IRC chatroom, to general agreement. I think many people don't entirely realize how bad it's gotten.

Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by Frondo on Saturday September 19, 2020 @04:19AM (#24526023)
Republicans are absolutely working to roll back legal protections for the LGBT community and have been engaged in a decades-long fight to reduce women's access to health care.

They're also fully in support of the immigration policies that have led to things like the very well-documented child separation.

In what ways are those not denying someone's humanity?

Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by lawnchair_larry on Saturday September 19, 2020 @11:29AM (#24528068)
First, those are lies. Second, in no way is that denying humanity.