News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by blake1 on Friday September 18, 2020 @09:53PM (#24524155)
McConnel had serious doubts that Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, would _fail_ to get a majority in the senate, so he forbade the nomination to come to a vote. So it’s a little different than you pose: you a pretending that Obama’s nomination came to a vote and lost (which would be entirely legitimate). The majority leader prevented that from even happening.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by stjohnswarts on Friday September 18, 2020 @09:59PM (#24524186)
That is not what happened at all, he didn't hold a vote because he didn't want to and used an excuse that "Presidents shouldn't be able to nominate a SCOTUS judge in their last year". Now he's changing it to "majority party situation" and that is not what he said when he refused to hold any confirmations. He is a sneaky snakey weasel and has been for decades.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by malwarebytess on Saturday September 19, 2020 @12:28AM (#24525072)
Re-read the comment.
Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by taurath on Friday September 18, 2020 @09:56PM (#24524168)
Sorry, if that were true, then obama could've nominated someone else.

Why would you need to block a vote you know you will win?

Re:Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died by erichocean on Friday September 18, 2020 @09:57PM (#24524174)
> [if] Obama had a Democratic Senate majority when he nominated Merrick Garland…

With a Democratic majority, Garland would have been confirmed. It's exactly because no Democratic majority in the Senate existed that Garland wasn't even voted on (and actually didn't even get a hearing).