Re:Ask HN: How would you make a site resistant to government...
by pumpmylemma on Friday April 15, 2011 @04:51PM
(#2452153)
I mentioned this in the Poker thread. (If I had time right now, I'd consider implementing it.) I would like and would use a DNS service that 1) did not keep any record of my queries and 2) would not propagate government takedowns (e.g. by ignoring updates with NS:ns2.cirfu.net.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: How would you make a site resistant to government...
by ra on Friday April 15, 2011 @08:22PM
(#2452758)
I'm writing a DNS service at the moment.
Care to elaborate?
Re:Ask HN: How would you make a site resistant to government...
by pumpmylemma on Friday April 15, 2011 @09:25PM
(#2452887)
1) Explicit privacy policy that never stores DNS requests on a per-client basis. I haven't followed the ISP retention laws but they seemed to be getting more and more ominous.
2) While caching DNS record, when freshing up a stale record,
if(isknownSeizureDomain(record)) ignore();
Re:Ask HN: How would you make a site resistant to government...
by ra on Friday April 15, 2011 @11:42PM
(#2453095)
Ah I understand, you're talking about a non-authoritative DNS server. I'm working on a DNS hosting service.
To solve your first requirement, check out http://www.opennicproject.org/publictier2servers
Re:Ask HN: How would you make a site resistant to government...
by pumpmylemma on Saturday April 16, 2011 @12:09PM
(#2454204)
I was. Thanks for the great link!