News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Trump offered to pardon Assange if he provided source for... by jessaustin on Friday September 18, 2020 @02:28PM (#24520216)
You, directly above: We know that Podesta was a victim of spear phishing.

You, directly above that: Assange's denials about Russia's involvement aren't credible on its face.

Yeah, I'm confused. This is all beside the point. It is lawful to publish true information about candidates that is of interest to the public.

Re:Trump offered to pardon Assange if he provided source for... by hackinthebochs on Friday September 18, 2020 @03:29PM (#24520933)
It turns out you need context to understand the meaning of words. If you keep reading, you will see the rest of that context. I wasn't saying "it is obviously false that Russia didn't hack the DNC", I was saying that "Assange cannot claim to know Russia didn't hack the DNC [unless he was involved directly]". See the difference?
Re:Trump offered to pardon Assange if he provided source for... by Balgair on Friday September 18, 2020 @03:29PM (#24520936)
As of 19:23 UTC, the poster's profile's 'About' section only lists: " "obvious troll" ".
Re:Trump offered to pardon Assange if he provided source for... by jessaustin on Friday September 18, 2020 @03:48PM (#24521153)
19:23?!? Oh shit, dude, you caught me! I had so meant to change that sometime in the last three years! After all, HN people can't be expected to understand a joke in any context!