Re:FreeCAD: A free and open source multiplatform 3D parametr...
by mihaaly on Friday September 18, 2020 @08:35AM
(#24515877)
I believe when one wants to use a software the incentives are not to spend time on testing or improving it but to save time on the original task at hand. Getting help from the software and not helping the software, not participating in its interest group society. For the purpose of the software - helping and carrying out tasks - lengthy digging in discussions for essential information is counter efficient.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FreeCAD: A free and open source multiplatform 3D parametr...
by jka on Friday September 18, 2020 @10:45AM
(#24517414)
Yep - it's completely fine to simply use software and not expect or contribute anything more to it; and in that sense it's good to have multiple options for any given task.
But given the ability and opportunity to provide feedback directly to a software project, they'll generally appreciate it and it'll lead to better outcomes for everyone, even if it takes a bit more time up-front.
Re:FreeCAD: A free and open source multiplatform 3D parametr...
by rkangel on Friday September 18, 2020 @11:58AM
(#24518403)
I've concluded that for me the price that I should pay for good open source software is good bug reports. If I'm not contributing at the very least help the contributors make their project better. This can sometimes take a little time to get a reasonably minimal set of steps to repeat and appropriate screenshots. Admittedly this is easier as I'm a software engineer so I have decent intuition as to what is needed so they don't have to come back to me.
Re:FreeCAD: A free and open source multiplatform 3D parametr...
by fireattack on Friday September 18, 2020 @01:21PM
(#24519417)
I agree with you in general, but in this very case, since there is already a wiki page for it, I guess the issue is well-known.