News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Uber backup driver indicted in 2018 self-driving crash that killed woman. Parent comment

Re:Uber backup driver indicted in 2018 self-driving crash th... by Retric on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @09:00PM (#24488507)
The maker and or operator of a self driving car can be held accountable depending on the specifics. IMO, we have this odd social expectation that humans killing people with cars or pollution is basically acceptable and nothing else really gets that pass.

IMO, killing someone with a car or a gun is a direct equivalent.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Uber backup driver indicted in 2018 self-driving crash th... by darkerside on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @09:08PM (#24488543)
It's equivalent, yes. When someone recklessly kills someone with a car, it's called vehicular manslaughter and they are punished for it. It's not considered acceptable.

Blurring the lines of accountability is an anti-feature. The killer feature for humans is that we can be held accountable.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Uber backup driver indicted in 2018 self-driving crash th... by Retric on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @11:02PM (#24489159)
That’s assuming it’s prosecuted which is rare. However, just looking at the laws directly you notice the odd exclusion.

In California for example vehicular manslaughter is specifically excluded from involuntary manslaughter and carries a lower penalty. It is also frequently just a misdemeanor.

[ Parent | on HN ]