Re:Uber backup driver indicted in 2018 self-driving crash th...
by baddox on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @08:49PM
(#24488451)
How do you define and determine whether a consumer "chose on price" or "chose on safety features"? Surely consumers consider both the price and the desirable features when they purchase a car, just like for every other purchase. I suspect that most consumers wouldn't buy a $100 car than has a 50% chance of exploding every time you enter it, and most consumer wouldn't buy a $500,000 car that was 5% safer than a $40,000 car.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber backup driver indicted in 2018 self-driving crash th...
by thelean12 on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @09:14PM
(#24488580)
The point is that you shouldn't be able to sell or buy a $100 car that has a 50% chance of exploding every time you enter it. Or more to the point, you shouldn't be able to sell a shitty self driving system. The post I was responding to was basically saying "let the free market figure out which car has a better self driving system" which is a horrible way to go about it.