I also had to teach myself a bunch of technical stuff to get xobni off the ground. Unlike grad courses this stuff was practical by definition.
For me YC and YC alums more closely fit the profile of an engineering grad program than a MBA program.
That's also possible to do in a more innovation/research-focused startup (biotech does this all the time), but it's not particularly common in tech startups afaik, mostly because "multi-year research 'til product" is not what investors want to hear.
Granted, the results are not always amazing in grad-school either, but quite a bit of basic research in PLs, systems, algorithms, etc. does come out of PhD theses. Could you really do something like Okasaki's "Purely Functional Data Structures" within the YC program?
Graham himself is actually doing an outside-of-academia version of PLs research with Arc. But most of the YC companies don't seem to be embarking on Arc-type projects.
Of course, YC has plenty to offer in the advising department - that said, I think the distinction is worth noting. Why? Because I think there will be more quality advisors shaken out of the woodwork by YC-like programs - particularly in different cities where perfectly talented mentors have built their fortunes and families and have no desire to move from. Just like not everyone has to go to Harvard to become a great grad student, people won't have to go to YC to have great start-up mentoring. And that's a good thing; our economy needs more than one "startup grad school". I'm excited not just about YC, but about the trend YC has kicked off - the number of great people attracted to other YC-like programs across the country is going to skyrocket, sooner rather than later. This will help the economy grow overall - and help shield the tech industry when the bubble that is "expensive academic credentialing as job qualification" pops.