Re:Talking is throwing fictional worlds at one another
by 082349872349872 on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @08:13AM
(#24480311)
Try diagramming that sentence. (base: "I behold pledges") Even just the last few words of that sentence:
... exemplified by
all the attributes
which can
win the affections
of its Citizens, and
command the respect
of the world.
have more structure than the pair of sentences: On @foxandfriends
Now
Enjoy
Re:Talking is throwing fictional worlds at one another
by ppod on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @08:09AM
(#24480275)
I'm not sure that those links completely show that you're wrong. The example you're replying to appears deeper than it is because each nested element is quite broad, so the absolute depth is not as much as it might seem (I think).
Re:Talking is throwing fictional worlds at one another
by 082349872349872 on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @08:21AM
(#24480374)
Agreed, there are listings, but even they are not always just a flat unary tree. For instance, there's the structure within the listing of:
(no ((local prejudices) or (attachments))
no (separate views)
nor (party animosities))
which is itself embedded within ... will misdirect ...
as on one side ... so, on another, ...
etc.
https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/3252/what-is...
https://www.thoughtco.com/recursion-grammar-1691901