News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Talking is throwing fictional worlds at one another by throwaway_pdp09 on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @06:35AM (#24479690)
I'm not a linguist but that to me is more a list (a sequence of qualifiers) than a recursion (a nesting). However, a quick browse shows I'm wrong so for those who also aren't sure

https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/3252/what-is...

https://www.thoughtco.com/recursion-grammar-1691901

Re:Talking is throwing fictional worlds at one another by 082349872349872 on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @08:13AM (#24480311)
Try diagramming that sentence. (base: "I behold pledges") Even just the last few words of that sentence:

    ... exemplified by
        all the attributes
          which can
            win the affections
              of its Citizens, and
           command the respect
              of the world.
have more structure than the pair of sentences:

    On @foxandfriends
      Now

    Enjoy
Re:Talking is throwing fictional worlds at one another by ppod on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @08:09AM (#24480275)
I'm not sure that those links completely show that you're wrong. The example you're replying to appears deeper than it is because each nested element is quite broad, so the absolute depth is not as much as it might seem (I think).
Re:Talking is throwing fictional worlds at one another by 082349872349872 on Tuesday September 15, 2020 @08:21AM (#24480374)
Agreed, there are listings, but even they are not always just a flat unary tree. For instance, there's the structure within the listing of:

    (no ((local prejudices) or (attachments))
     no (separate views)
     nor (party animosities))
which is itself embedded within

    ... will misdirect ...
    as on one side ... so, on another, ...
    etc.