The price of solar doesn't include energy storage, so the two can't be easily compared.
> if the state is covering the insurance cost
Yes, though I'd be interested to know what those costs actually are.
> if you have enough Uranium available. Where do you buy your Uranium? How long will the Uranium reserves last?
Australia and Canada, both allied countries (to France/Germany), have megatons of the stuff [0]. Current reserves are enough to last about 90 years [0] but exploration is limited, more deposits likely exist.
Spent fuel rods can also be reprocessed [1].
> And where will you deposit the nuclear waste?
First, reprocess it [1]. When it's finally done for good, bury it deep in the ground [2].
Remember, nuclear isn't a new technology. It's been around for decades and solutions to these problems exist.
[0]: https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fu...
[1]: https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fu...
[2]: https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fu...
Countries try to find suitable places to put their nuclear waste for 60 years now and haven't managed to select a single one, yet. The process costs billions of dollars of tax payers money. And it is roughly as fast as the invention of nuclear fusion. The success is always only 30 years away in the future.
When you're riding a dead horse the best strategy is to get off.
20 Hydro power
43.24 Solar farms
50 Nuclear (with state-covered insurance costs)
60 Onshore wind
61 Natural gas turbines without CO2 capture
100 Nuclear EPR
So nuclear is never cheaper than solar and only cheaper than wind if the state is covering the insurance cost! And your argument about nuclear ramping up and down at will only works, if you have enough Uranium available. Where do you buy your Uranium? How long will the Uranium reserves last? And where will you deposit the nuclear waste? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwY2E0hjGuU