The Hayworth-Miller 2019 Debate About Brain Preservation

Re:The Hayworth-Miller 2019 Debate About Brain Preservation by compscistd on Sunday September 13, 2020 @06:57PM (#24464641)

In many respects, I think you already break your stream of consciousness when you sleep or are knocked out. When a copy of your brain is made, that copy will experience what all of us do after a good night’s rest in a train: waking up to an unfamiliar environment, subtly changed by random firing of your neurons when you were asleep. The “you before sleep” is effectively not the “you after sleep” because there was a break in the chain.

Thus, there’s no benefit to the “you that didn’t go on vacation”. There was a benefit to the “you that did go on vacation”.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Hayworth-Miller 2019 Debate About Brain Preservation by gruez on Sunday September 13, 2020 @08:17PM (#24465182)

So you acknowledge that in the event of a brain transfer, two versions of your consciousness will exist, and that the "original" one will be lost, but it's fine because neither would be able to tell (ie. the original will be "going to sleep", and the copy will be "waking up")?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Hayworth-Miller 2019 Debate About Brain Preservation by danbmil99 on Monday September 14, 2020 @12:49AM (#24466862)

Exactly. I would put forth that you can take it even further, and assume that every moment In time represents a recreation of your conscious experience of the past up until the present.

Under that perspective, Consciousness is like the illusion of motion on a computer monitor. There's some sort of framerate, related to the minimum period of time in which you can perceive a conscious thought, and the sequence playing back at a high frequency creates the illusion of continuity.

[ Parent | on HN ]