Re:Joel Spolsky on allocating ownership in your startup
by ry0ohki on Thursday April 14, 2011 @07:54AM
(#2446454)
The general advice I've heard is you don't ever want 50/50 splits because if there are important decisions to be made, you can often end up in deadlock, and no one is truly in charge of making a final call or being responsible. Since I don't have enough karma on onstartups to ask Joel this, I'm curious what his response would be.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Joel Spolsky on allocating ownership in your startup
by _chap on Thursday April 14, 2011 @08:58AM
(#2446619)
I use to think this way, but I'm agreeing with Joel.
If the 2 founders can't make a contentious decision as a team, they're not much of a team.
Re:Joel Spolsky on allocating ownership in your startup
by patrickyeon on Thursday April 14, 2011 @08:15AM
(#2446499)
One way I've heard of to solve that problem is 45/45 and 10% to a mutually agreed upon third party (a mentor, say) who can (and has what it takes to) break those ties. I'm sure there's a bit more contractual magic to make sure the third party doesn't just sell off their part, and some people may balk at just giving away one tenth of their company. I would argue that if you're worried about 50/50 splits pulling your company apart, it's worth that small number of shares to keep your company going.