Android OEMs have bad battery life because they install their own services and layers of nonsense over the top of Android. That doesn't change the fundamental issue here.
You understand me replying to you and talking about how they're not balancing anything but personal gain and optics is relevant to that?
Or you don't understand that?
> Oh please.
> Or you don't understand that?
What I understand is that your posts have wandered between being dismissive, condescending, and argumentative. I've ignored that to this point, but since you've been insisted on being consistently so in 3 messages straight, I'm calling you on it.
If you have a point other than being argumentative, it's not well made.
Especially after starting your initial reply to me with
>I have absolutely no idea what any of this has to do with my original point or my reply.
Do you know what dismissive means?
-
If I come across as dismissive it's because you really don't seem to know what you're talking about, and if anything this attempt to deflect from the fact just cements that.
Me telling you that your comment comes across as being written by someone not aware of the depth of the problem is exactly what it sounds like, you said things that strongly implied you were not aware of the deeper background to this post.
If you choose to take it as a personal slight, be my guest.
-
Likewise if you're going to play the "music players can be crypto miners" card I'm going to be dismissive of that too, it's a lazy attempt to distract from the problem.
Of course apps can be bad actors. Jumping to the most fear-mongery example possible is just that... fear mongering.
For every app mining cryptocurrency, there's 10 more that are just poorly behaved in respect to battery life.
Trying to act like OEM's attempts to lock down background apps should be dictated by the former rather than the latter is something I'll gladly dismiss. It's nonsense.
I said overbearing app killers aren't optimizing for battery life.
Do you think that's the only knob for battery life? I'm currently working on an unreleased Android device at our company, the number of knobs we have to turn for battery life is insane. Throttling behavior, optimizing existing services, screen off behavior, etc.
App killers don't work, again, that's why vanilla Android devices consistently top battery life charts. Forcing apps to start up more often, breaking user functionality, it's not a real solution.
Android already has built-in management of background services and has had it for half a decade: (https://developer.android.com/training/monitoring-device-sta...)
The defaults scope of background processing is already very tight on Android, breaking that already limited scope for little to negative gain isn't helping anyone but themselves.
A non-user modifiable app killer isn't the fine line separating us from media app currency miners.
How are Google's devices keeping OS guarantees while delivering some of the best in class battery life figured on Android
Also, imagine seriously implying it's ok they blanket-kill user installed media players because there's a chance they might be currency mining?
https://www.cnet.com/news/vlc-for-android-blacklists-huawei-...
> The decision came in response to the Chinese phone maker's decision to cut off all background apps except its own, which stops VLC's audio playback, VideoLAN said in a tweet.
Here's a real, not made up, not founded in a slippery slope from allowing music to allowing crypto mining, example of what these manufacturers are doing to users and devs alike.
-
It's not about battery life, it's about flexing their power to seem like they're doing something, while ensuring their bundled apps are the best option for a wide range of tasks
In fact, you can look at the manufacturer list and come to that conclusion yourself.
The manufacturers at the top of the list of breaking optimizers are mostly selling devices heavily subsidized by bundled services. Even Samsung is more aggressive on cheaper devices that target BRIC markets because they need revenue from bundled services.
-
Google is the only exception to the rule... until you realize their devices are just following the guarantees Android makes.
And they still manage to have some of the best battery life on the market.
That's because it's not even as simple as just blindly killing background apps.
When you kill these background apps, users get in the habit of opening the apps back up manually to not miss updates.
Repeatedly waking the radio is more battery consuming than if the OS just keeps it's promises and smartly wakes these apps.
It's not like they get infinite processing time anyways, having this stuff be managed intelligently instead of just taking a sledgehammer to the concept of background processing is better for everyone involved but a manufacturer that wants their music app to be the only functional one...