[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/three-tubs-of-ballot...
[2] https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/04/24/28_mil...!
[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/09/us/politics/wisconsin-ele...
[4] https://noqreport.com/2020/06/28/caught-on-camera-postal-wor...
For those unfamiliar with the story, in the 2004 election for governor of Washington, the Republican candidate (Dino Rossi) won the initial count by a very narrow margin (261 votes), triggering a legally-mandated recount. The recount closed the gap to Rossi only winning by 42 votes. A manual recount was performed, and during the manual recount election workers "found" a bunch of ballots; in arguments before the left-leaning state supreme court, the court rejected requests for applying the same recount methodologies in all counties (in opposition to Washington state law) and the "found" votes, mostly from D-leaning counties, put Gregoire into the lead. The Democrats in the state then successfully argued in court against any further recounts, and Rossi conceded without taking his complaint to the state supreme court. Gregoire took office shortly thereafter.
I don't know who should have won that election, but to an outsider it sure LOOKED like some fraud was occurring, especially since the "found" ballots didn't match the statistical distribution of the rest of the votes in the counties, and leaned D significantly more heavily than the counties' original ballots.
So THAT is why I oppose mail in voting. Mail in ballots introduce custody, integrity and identity issues, as well as enable vote-buying and selective vote harvesting, and so are amenable to fraud. We have seen all of these things happen; they aren't theoretical.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Washington_gubernatorial_...
A manual recount was performed, and during the manual recount election workers "found" a bunch of ballots
This is exactly what happened with the Santa Clara County (CA, USA) transit tax a few years ago. It initially failed by several hundred votes (2/3 majority was needed). Over the next few weeks, they kept "finding" additional ballots, and every batch had disproportionately high Yes vote percentages on the measure (although all other races were unaffected). Then the second they reached the needed threshold, they conveniently stopped finding ballots.I'm not sure how this relates to mail in voting though? If there was fraud and D ballots were being hidden where was that happening? Wouldn't it be during counting, not transportation? Would voting in person have changed this or made it impossible?
The found ballots were absentee ballots, which were the only form of mail-in balloting available at the time.
Do you have any answers for my 3 sourced statements other than naked assertions?
[0] https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/more-than-20-000-dea...