Re:Where to get a cost effective 500GB of durable cloud stor...
by ra on Wednesday April 13, 2011 @11:00PM
(#2445382)
Thanks. Yeah I use EC2 for other things, and you're right. Reduced redundancy S3 is at least as good as a RAID1 dedicated server, possibly even better[1].
1. Amazon S3 standard storage is designed to provide 99.999999999% durability and to sustain the concurrent loss of data in two facilities, while RRS is designed to provide 99.99% durability and to sustain the loss of data in a single facility.
A couple of months agao, I went through the same research as you and it is hard to beat S3 storage costs and ease of use. My requirements are more modest at about 100 GB per month though.
There is a handy Amazon calculator here: http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/calc5.html