News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destruction, scientists warn. Parent comment

Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by refurb on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:15PM (#24447391)
Not sure I believe the 20 miles thing unless you could count an old road that hasn't been used in 100 years as "developed".

There are massive swaths of land in the lower 48 that are pretty much untouched beyond a few footpaths that are rarely used.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by jeffbee on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:21PM (#24447440)
Well, go right ahead and name any place that is, say, fifty miles from a road.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by rcpt on Friday September 11, 2020 @09:23PM (#24449045)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/02/20/using...

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42104894

The best one can do is 21 miles from a road - in Yellowstone

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by petepete on Saturday September 12, 2020 @02:58AM (#24450466)
I just had a go and thought I'd found somewhere with a 60km road-free radius, then zoomed out and found that I'd strayed into Mexico.

Sugar bunker, just NW of Las Vegas has a few places with 50km (~30 miles) though.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by ptmcc on Friday September 11, 2020 @06:01PM (#24447800)
I agree, but the fact that there was a forest/logging road in that area as recently as 50 years ago does indicate that it is an environment recently impacted by humans.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by volkl48 on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:32PM (#24447536)
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that statistic includes every Forest Service road on the books.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by jeffbee on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:38PM (#24447585)
Yes, clearly. In what way is a forest road not a road?

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.7775746,-122.9327754,2401a,3...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by refurb on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:52PM (#24447732)
I think when people think “road” they think something maintained and well used.

A forestry or old logging road that hasn’t been used in 50 years doesn’t come to mind.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by aembleton on Saturday September 12, 2020 @09:17AM (#24452191)
Looks in remarkably good condition for something that hasn't been used for 50 years. You can even see tyre marks: https://www.google.com/maps/@39.7941501,-122.9358659,3a,75y,...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by jeffbee on Friday September 11, 2020 @06:36PM (#24448045)
I can't really know what people think is or isn't a road but these are objectively roads and I think you are understating the extent to which resource extraction activities use these roads today, and the degree to which any road, no matter how much or little used, alters the ecosystem through which it passes.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by refurb on Friday September 11, 2020 @07:13PM (#24448318)
A road (dirt trail) that hasn't been in use for 100 years is not impacting the ecosystem to any extent at all.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by freddie_mercury on Friday September 11, 2020 @11:36PM (#24449610)
Do you have any support for your repeated claims that the roads under discussion haven't been used for 100 years?

Virtually no forest service roads are older than 50 years old, as most were constructed after WW2 to assist in logging.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by aspaceman on Friday September 11, 2020 @07:24PM (#24448386)
The point is that humans have touched it. There’s a perception there’s large segments of the American West and Midwest that haven’t been touched. Which is what they’re describing. Almost every place, at one point or another was close to the road. When we’ve only had cars for the last 100 or so, that’s quite a statement.

You’re splitting hairs.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi... by refurb on Friday September 11, 2020 @11:49PM (#24449666)
People really believe there are parts of the west and mid-west that haven't been "touched" (we're changing the discussion here)?

The entire country has been surveyed, so of course it's been touched (as defined by some human presence at some point in time).

[ Parent | on HN ]