Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in-app purchase

Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by matsemann on Friday September 11, 2020 @04:14PM (#24446858)

That's whataboutism. In this post it's about Apple. That others do it doesn't excuse it.

And a big difference with Google is that you can sideload or use other stores on Android. And same on Windows, you don't have to use the store.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by Bud on Friday September 11, 2020 @04:16PM (#24446879)

That's not a big difference, with Android, because nobody is making any money doing that. It doesn't work.

I didn't mention Windows. I was discussing platforms where everyone takes a 30% cut. You may say this is mere whataboutism, but anyone who reads Hacker News knows that 99% of the anger and attacks on this practice are directed at Apple. Nobody bitches at Google and Sony and Microsoft for doing the exact same thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by ksk on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:57PM (#24447768)

Google gets hit on the privacy front pretty regularly. I guess it depends on the issue. But not to worry, I'm sure there will be plenty of time and opportunity to complain against injustices from all corporations in the future. A significant chunk of early adopters for Apple/MS/Google products were nerds who spread the good word. Its no surprise that issues like privacy, developer freedom and hacker-ethics will drive the conversation against these companies.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Apple: Person-to-person experiences do not have to use in... by matsemann on Friday September 11, 2020 @06:01PM (#24447807)

Because it's not the exact same thing. Context matters.

[ Parent | on HN ]