Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi...
by rcpt on Friday September 11, 2020 @03:52PM
(#24446646)
There's nothing wrong with population density. We'd do better to have people living in dense city centers instead of sprawled out into every corner of the wilderness.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi...
by airstrike on Friday September 11, 2020 @04:06PM
(#24446777)
COVID-19 begs to differ
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi...
by hyper_reality on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:05PM
(#24447312)
Many countries with high population density have managed to deal with COVID-19 rather well, and vice-versa.
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi...
by NovemberWhiskey on Friday September 11, 2020 @04:34PM
(#24447062)
North Dakota has more than 10x the per-capita COVID-19 infection rate of New York City right now, despite having only about 0.03% of the population density.
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi...
by airstrike on Friday September 11, 2020 @10:34PM
(#24449346)
You're comparing two cities that got hit by COVID-19 in totally different time periods. No other place in the US had a spike like NYC
Re:Wildlife in ‘catastrophic decline’ due to human destructi...
by rcpt on Friday September 11, 2020 @09:18PM
(#24449019)
Study: Urban Density Not Linked to Higher Coronavirus Infection Rates—and Is Linked to Lower COVID-19 Death Rates
https://www.jhsph.edu/news/news-releases/2020/urban-density-...