Re:Germany's nationwide emergency warning day sees bumpy rol...
by dewey on Friday September 11, 2020 @08:30AM
(#24441983)
In the Spiegel article they cited privacy issues (apparently the app doesn't have that...) which was later changed to "the big telecoms in Germany don't offer that service".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Germany's nationwide emergency warning day sees bumpy rol...
by lxgr on Friday September 11, 2020 @10:06AM
(#24442964)
Just to clarify for everyone not familiar with how cell broadcast works: It's entirely passive/unacknowledged, much like IP multicast on a local link (without IGMP).
The risk it poses to users' privacy is about the same as that of an FM radio receiver.
Re:Germany's nationwide emergency warning day sees bumpy rol...
by BjoernKW on Friday September 11, 2020 @09:25AM
(#24442503)
In Germany, unfortunately "something about privacy" seems to have become the default argument against anything that a party either can't or doesn't want to implement for one reason or another.
Strangely enough, privacy concerns are rarely raised when it comes to paper-based processes or obsolete technologies such as fax, which authorities still feel comfortable with.
Re:Germany's nationwide emergency warning day sees bumpy rol...
by netsharc on Friday September 11, 2020 @09:23AM
(#24442485)
Fefe has a post (in German) about that, and the first excuse was uttered by someone in a high position who despite his job title apparently knew nothing about what he was talking about, and that the paragraph with the excuse got changed, after "the censor returned from peeing":
Re:Germany's nationwide emergency warning day sees bumpy rol...
by mschuster91 on Friday September 11, 2020 @09:32AM
(#24442580)
Or rather, after some public outrage on Twitter about said incompetency.