News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tim Sweeney on Apple and Google by sokoloff on Friday September 11, 2020 @08:05AM (#24441769)
That’s not inconsistent. Users can choose to use the Epic store or not. If they choose not to use it, they can’t buy games from that store, just like I can’t buy Trader Joe’s food if I decide to not use the TJ’s store.
Re:Tim Sweeney on Apple and Google by pharke on Friday September 11, 2020 @08:25AM (#24441936)
Exactly, people are having a hissy fit over exclusive content that has no further price than downloading a free store app. It's like whingeing about driving to another store to get the brand of ice cream that you like. I have no problem with that as long as the device manufacturer doesn't limit me to a single store. Preferably I'd like to be able to choose any store or independent content. More choices, more freedom, more competition.
Re:Tim Sweeney on Apple and Google by falcolas on Friday September 11, 2020 @09:15AM (#24442407)
Having to go to the EGS for a given exclusive game is not choice. It’s not freedom. It’s definitely not competition.

Even if I buy a game broadly available on multiple platforms, I’m not getting a discount on it for going to EGS, despite their lower cut.

Re:Tim Sweeney on Apple and Google by OCASM on Friday September 11, 2020 @11:28AM (#24443837)
It is in fact those three things. Different stores compete with each other providing different value, both users and devs having the freedom to choose to support one or the other (or all) based on their personal criteria.
Re:Tim Sweeney on Apple and Google by belltaco on Friday September 11, 2020 @11:47AM (#24444028)
Software exclusivity is definitely a choice compared to hardware exclusivity. And you don't even have to pay a cent to download the Epic launcher.