Re:Extinction Rebellion: Nuclear power 'only option' says fo...
by Tepix on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:43AM
(#24440816)
Building and tearing down nuclear power plants tends to cost vastly more money (billions!) than estimated at the time of their planning, especially with the more recent ones. They require massive subsidies.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Extinction Rebellion: Nuclear power 'only option' says fo...
by AnthonyMouse on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:48AM
(#24440861)
"Especially the more recent ones" is strong evidence that the problem could be solved, e.g. by building modern plants using a regulatory environment similar to the one that created the U.S. plants that have been running safely for decades.
And how much is climate change estimated to cost?
Re:Extinction Rebellion: Nuclear power 'only option' says fo...
by ClumsyPilot on Friday September 11, 2020 @05:58AM
(#24440937)
I was aleays intrigued by constant arguments around cost.
Maybe energy is too cheap! An average pair of jeans is travels the world 3 times at various stages of manufacture and distribution. That shouldnt be happening