Re:Portland adopts landmark facial recognition ordinances
by jackinloadup on Thursday September 10, 2020 @01:03AM
(#24429049)
I feel the same way. It seems like the future is going to be some cyberpunk place where people have masks or face tattoos to obscure tracking regardless of legislation like this. I'm very pro privacy and facial recognition is quite scary but it seems an impossible tech to contain.
In theory, but not in practice, we can ensure governments aren't using it but businesses and private individuals seem almost impossible. Certainly underground businesses will take advantage of it like the mafia or other groups who figure out how to weaponize it.
Re:Portland adopts landmark facial recognition ordinances
by jhardy54 on Thursday September 10, 2020 @02:17AM
(#24429425)
> The thing that confuses me is this is clearly done for the rioters but they're the ones with the ideology that generally results in this type of draconian citizen tracking.
If you think anti-authoritarianism is an exclusively right-wing value you're sorely mistaken. Even the term 'libertarian' was co-opted from lefties. You'll learn more if you approach confusing issues with curiosity rather than calling Portland "upside down world" because your biases conflict with reality.
Re:Portland adopts landmark facial recognition ordinances
by waheoo on Thursday September 10, 2020 @09:37PM
(#24438332)
Do you know what the word generally means?
Re:Portland adopts landmark facial recognition ordinances
by jhardy54 on Saturday September 12, 2020 @06:25PM
(#24456407)
Welcome to HN! Please read the HN guidelines on commenting: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I'm happy to discuss this topic with you as long as you're willing to hold up your end of the conversation.
Facial recognition and citizen movement tracking is a slippery slippery slope I want nobody in power to control.
The thing that confuses me is this is clearly done for the rioters but they're the ones with the ideology that generally results in this type of draconian citizen tracking.
Its an upside down world man.
I do agree that limits on photography are probably unconstitutional though.
And I'm not sure the gain justifies the cost. Not being able to facial rec a robbery suspect is going to have tragic outcomes.