Re:The Long-Term Stock Exchange Opens for Business
by nicoburns on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @10:29AM
(#24421372)
> On the other hand, short-term shareholders, inasmuch as they prefer returned capital, are then freed to invest in other businesses.
I'm not sure that's a benefit if they then destroy those businesses too.
Re:The Long-Term Stock Exchange Opens for Business
by ethbr0 on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @02:01PM
(#24423847)
Not all businesses are productive. Look at a few decades of Japanese economic history.
If capital is tied up in a failing business that's pursuing a "long term strategy," then it's not freed for new businesses.
SpaceX and Tesla (to name two HN faves) probably wouldn't exist had PayPal retained more of its capital.
If PayPal et al. had retained profits in the business for a long term goal, a substantial number of innovate companies couldn't have formed.
The more nuanced problem is likely that short-term and long-term shareholders' goals are mutually exclusive. That is, there is a rarely a strategy that's optimal for both.
Coupled with the fact that some businesses (apps!) favor short-term strategies, while others (biotech!) favor long-term strategies.