Re:Assange Hearing Day 6
by foldr on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @04:54AM
(#24418867)
I don't follow. If he's been charged with things that he's not actually done, then he's innocent and can show that in court.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
The fact that someone is innocent is no guarantee that they can prove it in court. Can you prove whether or not you sent a particular IM a dozen years ago on a device that you no longer have access to?
And the rest of my point stands. The US government is not particularly upset that he failed to crack a password. They are upset that he created Wikileaks and publicly embarrassed a lot of influential people.
>The fact that someone is innocent is no guarantee that they can prove it in court.
He doesn't have to prove it, just show that it's plausible. The burden of proof is on the prosecution.
>The US government is not particularly upset that he failed to crack a password. They are upset that he created Wikileaks and publicly embarrassed a lot of influential people.
I think they probably are upset that he tried to help someone hack into a DoD system.