AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine study put on hold due to suspected adverse reaction

Re:AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine study put on hold due to sus... by orra on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @04:39AM (#24418772)

> Most countries have already had SARS-2 work its way through them significantly.

Noope, that isn’t what antibody testing shows. Take England for example. Coronavirus working its way through a mere, say, 6% of the population is devastating.

> The utility of a vaccine might be lower than you think.

Nonsense. We need to protect the other 94%.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine study put on hold due to sus... by lbeltrame on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @04:12PM (#24425379)

The problem with aggregate numbers like that 6% is that they assume a uniform distribution of the virus within the population, which is not the case: some areas are far more hit than others. I think this should always be kept into account.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine study put on hold due to sus... by orra on Wednesday September 16, 2020 @07:24AM (#24491528)

Yeah, in major population centres like London, about 20% of people caught it. Whereas rural England will be lower than that 6% average.

That’s the areas. As for age or demographics of people who caught it in England, I don’t think that is well known.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine study put on hold due to sus... by ketamine__ on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @12:58PM (#24423034)

You're referring to antibody testing? Is any T-cell testing being done?

[ Parent | on HN ]