Re:Apple countersues Epic, seeks punitive damages
by tssva on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @04:30AM
(#24418717)
Android allows installation of apps outside of the Google Play store but Epic is pursuing the same path against Google.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple countersues Epic, seeks punitive damages
by Kuinox on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @04:38AM
(#24418770)
Yes, for a different reason.
Epics wanted a deal with oneplus for to have epic store preinstalled on their device, and google pressured oneplus to cancel the deal.
https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/13/21368395/fortnite-epic-ga...
Re:Apple countersues Epic, seeks punitive damages
by tssva on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @01:55PM
(#24423764)
Although brought up in the lawsuit it is not a basis for any of the counts in the lawsuit. The counts in the lawsuit all go to the same conduct they are accusing Apple of.
Re:Apple countersues Epic, seeks punitive damages
by colejohnson66 on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @10:18AM
(#24421238)
Didn’t Epic initially go around the Play Store and require you to download an installer from their website? And then it turned out that it was a good malware vector? That’s what I fear will happen if we get alternate stores: lax security leading to malware.
Re:Apple countersues Epic, seeks punitive damages
by ac29 on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @01:12PM
(#24423211)
Yes, it had a bug that could lead to a different malicious application being able to install its own APKs: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/112630336
Re:Apple countersues Epic, seeks punitive damages
by Kuinox on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @12:57PM
(#24423029)
Make it that you must sign the binaries.
Google distribute/manage the keys, but are not allowed to veto legal things.
Re:Apple countersues Epic, seeks punitive damages
by colejohnson66 on Wednesday September 09, 2020 @03:01PM
(#24424530)
That serves no purpose. If Google can’t veto any signature requests, it’s no different than having no signature at all; You’ll just have signed malware.