News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Western Digital is trying to redefine the word “RPM” by wtallis on Monday September 07, 2020 @08:47PM (#24404194)
kB, MB, GB, etc. were genuinely ill-defined when the drive manufacturers started using them to their advantage. Those units were not standardized by SI or ISO, there was precedent for both the binary and decimal interpretations, the unambiguously binary KiB, MiB, etc. had not yet been introduced, and industry standards organizations like JEDEC and IEC were not particularly helpful in resolving the situation.

None of those mitigating/confounding factors apply to RPM, so the current lies are more blatant.

(Though it does seem somewhat relevant to point out here that a "500GB" drive usually has an accessible capacity of 500,107,862,016 bytes, implying an effective definition of 1GB=1,000,215,724 bytes, which is neither 1024^3 bytes nor 10^9, nor 10^9 rounded up to the nearest whole (binary-sized) sector. And that effective GB definition varies with drive capacity.)

Re:Western Digital is trying to redefine the word “RPM” by pseudalopex on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @06:07PM (#24414105)
Different 500 GB models have different capacities. They're just guaranteed to hold at least 500,000,000,000 bytes.
Re:Western Digital is trying to redefine the word “RPM” by wtallis on Tuesday September 08, 2020 @06:41PM (#24414447)
I haven't actually been able to verify with multiple 500GB hard drives, but the exact byte count I quoted does seem to be universally standard for 500GB SSDs.