News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT-3 generated Nassim Taleb aphorisms by Barrin92 on Monday September 07, 2020 @02:44PM (#24401566)
>A neural net can approximate any continuous function (from one euclidean space to another)

Which doesn't answer the question by the way because Neural Nets suffer the same limitations of Turing Machines, that is to say even a neural net can't solve the halting problem.

The fact that something is a universal function approximator should not be mistaken as equivalent to "isn't limited in functionality".

Re:GPT-3 generated Nassim Taleb aphorisms by X6S1x6Okd1st on Monday September 07, 2020 @06:02PM (#24403318)
> that is to say even a neural net can't solve the halting problem.

Can anything?

Re:GPT-3 generated Nassim Taleb aphorisms by Barrin92 on Monday September 07, 2020 @06:45PM (#24403575)
well humans can certainly deal with a lot of halting problems, because humans can make decisions that aren't obviously computational or algorithmic in nature.

Which is actually the relevant question that people seem to have skipped over completely, at least from living organisms it appears fairly likely that intelligence isn't just computational, or at least not simply computational in the way turing machines are.

Re:GPT-3 generated Nassim Taleb aphorisms by X6S1x6Okd1st on Monday September 07, 2020 @07:15PM (#24403732)
> well humans can certainly deal with a lot of halting problems

Could you give an example of a halting problem that humans can solve?

> it appears fairly likely that intelligence isn't just computational, or at least not simply computational in the way turing machines are.

Do you have supporting evidence?