News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Programmer Salary Taboo by jurjenh on Tuesday April 12, 2011 @08:40PM (#2440116)
That would never work. You'd find some garbage in the output, or even worse, get a core dump due to n being undefined. I think you mean 2x * 1000. .... or I've been refactoring my code for too long.

But yes, this is generally the rule I use as well, take the hourly rate and double it and add a K (eg $30/hr = $60K)

Doesn't include holidays, sick leave or efficiency trade-offs (billable time vs maintenance, research). Personally I use an estimate of about 75% efficiency to get a realistic answer, so then your formula becomes 3/4 * x * 1000

So at $175/hr I'd expect something like 130,000 annually. Given that its said he's quite frugal and doesn't mind hard work, it could well end up being around the 250-300K, but I'd expect he'd end up burning out after a year or 3.

Re:The Programmer Salary Taboo by rapind on Tuesday April 12, 2011 @09:23PM (#2440263)
For 75% efficiency I assume you mean 3/4 * 2 * $175 * 1000 = $262,500 / year.

3/4 on it's own is less than %40 efficiency. I.e. Taking half the year off.

You also just stated the same thing slashcom did while meaning to correct him?

Re:The Programmer Salary Taboo by jurjenh on Tuesday April 12, 2011 @11:50PM (#2440675)
yes, quite right... maybe I should go and lie down somewhere...

But hey, at 75% efficiency at a half year's work at that rate I could probably afford it...

Re:The Programmer Salary Taboo by rapind on Wednesday April 13, 2011 @08:38AM (#2441866)
quite true ;)