News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We didn't encrypt your password, we hashed it by alexbanks on Sunday September 06, 2020 @10:31AM (#24391563)
> They'd have no qualms stripping me of my license to practice engineering for knowingly approving an unsafe design

Presumably there would be repercussions at the government level if a company repeatedly demanded engineers do things worthy of stripping their licenses though, no?

Re:We didn't encrypt your password, we hashed it by slavik81 on Sunday September 06, 2020 @04:52PM (#24394580)
This varies by jurisdiction, but perhaps I oversimplified. There is another reason that doesn't happen.

The individual engineer doing the work needs a license, but the company itself also needs a permit to practice. The permit must be held by an engineer, who is personally responsible for the engineering that occurs under their permit.

So, the permit holder needs to worry not just about their own ethical behaviour, but that of all engineers in the company. They are incentivized to ensure the company will hold the public safety paramount, or to walk away if they cannot (thereby leaving the company without a permit).

If the company has a pattern of misbehaviour, it may be difficult to obtain a permit.

Re:We didn't encrypt your password, we hashed it by alexbanks on Sunday September 06, 2020 @05:38PM (#24394872)
_Exactly_. Tech companies regularly exist purely based off of illegal business models (they call them _Disruptions_).

So, yes, we agree, if there are repercussions for a company regularly breaking the law, then engineers can and should refuse work that has negative legal or moral repercussions. But in the world of tech, that's not the case.