News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its Name. Parent comment

Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by switch11 on Saturday September 05, 2020 @09:01PM (#24388102)
you and pretty much everyone else

can't believe the amount of 'wishful thinking can replace science' that Tesla pushes out

and now he has gotten into Neuralink and chips in the brains of pigs stupidness

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by manicdee on Sunday September 06, 2020 @12:50AM (#24389059)
Do you mean long range EV wishful thinking, improved battery technology wishful thinking, market-changing utility scale battery wishful thinking, Supercharger network wishful thinking or some other kind of wishful thinking?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by etaioinshrdlu on Sunday September 06, 2020 @02:31AM (#24389439)
Well, none of those are very deadly most of the time and they don't put human life into the hands of algorithms.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by vaxman on Sunday September 06, 2020 @03:44AM (#24389749)
So you’re saying touching a Supercharger in 110F temps tomorrow and discharging it into a lithium battery contained in a hot car that’s been driving through such temps for hours is totally safe!
[ Parent | on HN ]