News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its Name. Parent comment

Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by 256lie on Saturday September 05, 2020 @08:46PM (#24388013)
It is unlikely to me that any company will "win" the self-driving race in this decade.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by mensetmanusman on Saturday September 05, 2020 @11:47PM (#24388815)
I used to have the same confidence about no AI beating the best human at Go any time soon.

Now I see the problem of self driving is now just data and and computation, each of which grows by bounds every month...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by 256lie on Sunday September 06, 2020 @12:15AM (#24388922)
Go can be simulated and self-trained. Self driving cars are robots interacting in the real world with multiple, stochastic agents. Real time hardware systems that are reliable and commercially viable will also be extremely difficult.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by mensetmanusman on Sunday September 06, 2020 @10:26PM (#24396173)
cars are also racking up millions of virtual miles in parallel...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by switch11 on Saturday September 05, 2020 @09:02PM (#24388108)
would be surprised if anyone came up with an actual self driving car in the next 2 to 3 decades
[ Parent | on HN ]