Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its Name

Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by starfallg on Saturday September 05, 2020 @08:41PM (#24387987)

The difference is that human can do true inference, whereas that's not really attainable even with the best in class ML models. So until we make breakthroughs in AI reasoning, we still need aides like LIDAR in order to workaround current limitations.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by objektif on Saturday September 05, 2020 @09:04PM (#24388128)

What does true inference mean?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by xsmasher on Saturday September 05, 2020 @10:43PM (#24388568)

If I see a motorcycle go behind a billboard and not come out, I can reason that there is a motorcycle behind a billboard. I assume that's what they mean.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving Capability' Falls Short of Its... by HenryKissinger on Saturday September 05, 2020 @09:32PM (#24388264)

Maybe ML researchers should try growing a live, organic human brain in the lab, rather than writing code.

Inb4 Dr. Frankenstein was the first ML pioneer.

[ Parent | on HN ]