Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it
by zajio1am on Saturday September 05, 2020 @06:41PM
(#24387426)
On Windows and Mac, there is Microsoft / Apple who decides what is set of OS APIs, and everything outside is external library.
In Linux, there is no such authority and therefore no sharp line separating 'core OS' and 'external library'. It is just conglomerate of Linux kernel and independently developed tools and libraries (where each of them is more-or-less optional).
Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it
by mixmastamyk on Saturday September 05, 2020 @01:35PM
(#24385348)
That way leads to high numbers of boxes with vulnerabilities, which may be "fine" for non-technical folks. That's not the audience linux serves however.
Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it
by nycticorax on Saturday September 05, 2020 @05:25PM
(#24386958)
I don't think it's at all clear that it would lead to high numbers of boxes with vulnerabilities. Is it clear that a Mac is more vulnerable than a desktop Linux box, if you control for for the technical sophistication of the person maintaining it? I don't think that's at all clear.
Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it
by mixmastamyk on Saturday September 05, 2020 @10:27PM
(#24388498)
While it's not guaranteed they'll be installed, the vast majority of linux desktops get security updates, including for all normally installed applications. That's a pretty big advantage over a manual update strategy.
Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it
by saalweachter on Saturday September 05, 2020 @05:48PM
(#24387116)
It does seem like there could be a, well, canonical set of common libraries of specified version-ranges for a particular version of a particular distribution which are dynamically linked and with updates pushed by the distro maintainer, and if the application developer needed something else it would be statically linked.
Why couldn't this work for a Linux-based OS? Honest question.