News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it. Parent comment

Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it by volsa_ on Saturday September 05, 2020 @11:25AM (#24384243)
I have been using the snap versions of Chromium, Discord, CLion and Spotify for a while now and I haven't noticed any slowness whatsoever. Sure the applications need some seconds (at most 5) to start up on a freshly booted machine but other than that it's pretty snappy (heh). The only issue I have encountered so far is that some applications don't respect the environments cursor theme (looking at you Spotify and Postman) but that's easily fixable by the package maintainers. Other than that I really don't understand the hate-train for snap. Coming from Arch Linux, PPAs seem like a PITA to me and an elegant solution such as the AUR doesn't exist in the Ubuntu ecosystem so snap / flatpak are the next closest thing to it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it by quadrifoliate on Saturday September 05, 2020 @11:58AM (#24384499)
Most applications on Macs start up instantaneously these days. 5 seconds is 50 times the limit for "instantaneous" feel. [1]

All of the raging discussions in this thread would be totally absent if Canonical had taken the time to make apps installed with snaps fast. Unfortunately, these days, the "make it work, make it right, make it fast" mantra seems to stop at the "make it work". At least the 20.04 release seems to be at that stage.

Congratulations, you just got a bunch of users who are going to avoid updates even more because you are going to make everything slower with your shiny new release.

-------------------

[1] https://www.nngroup.com/articles/response-times-3-important-...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it by sroussey on Saturday September 05, 2020 @02:29PM (#24385744)
No, most apps are slow the first time they are run on Mac (not as bad as first run of snap though, usually). After that, pretty fast. AppStore apps seem to always be fast.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it by readams on Saturday September 05, 2020 @11:46AM (#24384402)
The 5 second load time is exactly the slowness people are complaining about. It's a ~100x slowdown.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it by monkpit on Saturday September 05, 2020 @02:12PM (#24385613)
> Coming from Arch Linux

Genuinely curious, why would you not just keep using Arch?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it by tuatoru on Saturday September 05, 2020 @05:55PM (#24387158)
In my case, too much gardening.

I got sick of it after six years or so and moved to Linux Mint. (This was before Manjaro was widely visible.) Been on Mint ever since: it's a better Ubuntu than Ubuntu, and a better Windows than Windows (for ordinary uses).

Note that Mint 20, although based on Ubuntu 2004, has removed snap from the base install. `apt install chromium-browser' takes you to a web page explaining why.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ubuntu 20.04 LTS’ snap obsession has snapped me off of it by gibs0ns on Saturday September 05, 2020 @11:20PM (#24388693)
I'm curious to the kind of gardening you're referring to, that applies to Arch but not Mint?

I will say, Linux Mint is my recommended Debian based distro for desktop use, it really is a better Ubuntu than Ubuntu.

[ Parent | on HN ]