Here's the Email That Could Cost Mark Zuckerberg Half of Facebook

Re:Here's the Email That Could Cost Mark Zuckerberg Half of ... by ultrasaurus on Tuesday April 12, 2011 @12:53PM (#2437998)

My first startup tried to answer this. Basically you take a secure hash of every email and store only the hash with a third party (which records the date, that's the monetization) -- but it's really really hard to sell companies on preventative technical solutions that involve math.

It works because you don't need to know which emails/files are important -- storing 250 bytes of hashes is practically free and tells you nothing about the contents, it just authenticates the contents later in court.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Here's the Email That Could Cost Mark Zuckerberg Half of ... by aplusbi on Tuesday April 12, 2011 @01:37PM (#2438233)

Out of curiosity, how did you verify that the emails were actually sent before storing the hash. What would prevent me from storing a hash on your server without sending the email?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Here's the Email That Could Cost Mark Zuckerberg Half of ... by ultrasaurus on Tuesday April 12, 2011 @03:58PM (#2438942)

We didn't (this story isn't exactly our use case), but think of how much easier this would be to arbitrate if Ceglia could prove that those emails existed on Feb 4, 2004 instead of this year.

Now it's possible he could have had the foresight to make and hash fake emails that he didn't send just in case, but you've still significantly raised the bar for fraud from just "finding" emails from 2004.

[ Parent | on HN ]