News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The First Randomized Controlled Trial on Vitamin D and Co... by dilippkumar on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:30PM (#24367804)
Previously on HN, a physician shared some thoughts on treating Vitamin D as a medication and not as a dietary supplement:

Part 1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24138590

Part 2: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24261948

To summarize - popping in large doses of Vitamin D is not exactly safe.

Re:The First Randomized Controlled Trial on Vitamin D and Co... by ellyagg on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:57PM (#24368157)
From the evidence I've seen, vitman D deficiency is a bigger problem than vitamin D toxicity.

We already have dozens of RCTs showing that vitmain D supplements prevent respiratory infections.

https://www.bmj.com/content/356/bmj.i6583

Re:The First Randomized Controlled Trial on Vitamin D and Co... by conorh on Thursday September 03, 2020 @06:27PM (#24369600)
Deva is deep into writing part 3 at the moment (the physicians husband here) where she reviews these trials, what they mean and how they should be interpreted. I think she will be finished soon.
Re:The First Randomized Controlled Trial on Vitamin D and Co... by pvsukale3 on Friday September 04, 2020 @01:57AM (#24372130)
Thanks for the update, would love her opinion on this paper's outcome.
Re:The First Randomized Controlled Trial on Vitamin D and Co... by KerryJones on Thursday September 03, 2020 @09:25PM (#24370858)
That previous commentary on part 2 hasn't explored the larger statistical significant over time. Yes, it _can_ cause problems, but there is far more evidence to show deficiency, and far less evidence to show that even when taken at high levels there aren't many cases of problems, and those problems are not very severe.

Here's some studies regarding vitamin toxicity and specifically Vitamin D3 including death rates: https://www.medscape.com/answers/819426-102375/what-is-the-p...

Re:The First Randomized Controlled Trial on Vitamin D and Co... by blithedale on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:39PM (#24367914)
Thank you thank you thank you. There is a craze for popping Vitamin D related to the raft of observational studies, here... so many of which never find a causal link.

Take my own particular condition: an inherited vascular dysplasia which causes frequent nose and GI bleeds. People with low Vitamin D seem to have a worse time of it in OBSERVATIONAL studies.

But people with GI bleeds so bad they have daily diarrhea from hemorrhages and anemia that disables them to the point they can't work aren't going to be out in the sun, and aren't going to be able to absorb as many vitamins in their gut due to the havoc the hemorrhaging is yielding.

Thinking really hard about the direction the arrow of causality runs here is massively important. Is it:

LOW VITAMIN D ---> BAD BLEEDING?

Or:

BAD BLEEDING ---> LOW VITAMIN D

And as the consequences of overdosing show, this isn't like popping an extra Metamucil cracker a day or something - dire stuff can happen.

Re:The First Randomized Controlled Trial on Vitamin D and Co... by ellyagg on Thursday September 03, 2020 @03:59PM (#24368190)
People dose themsevles with OTC vitamin D all the time, including me. It doesn't appear to be a crisis. C19, otoh...

You saw the apparent effect size in this study, right?